Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 06:52:33 05/09/05
Go up one level in this thread
On May 09, 2005 at 06:03:59, Graham Banks wrote:
>On May 09, 2005 at 05:35:02, Clive Munro wrote:
>
>>Graham
>>
>>I am very surprised at how well the Chessmaster program is doing against the top
>>opposition! Are all the unique settings better than the default setting?
>>
>>Clive
>
>I would say that all the CM9000 and CM10th settings in this tournament are
>better than the Default settings.
>The CM9000 settings in this tournament are the cream of the crop!
>CM10th settings are still being rigorously tested,
Hi Graham
Where can such tests be found? I only know from testing
CM-settings vs CM-settings, or knockout tournament over
only 20 games per match and a trial by Jason to test
various CM-settings against Shredder 9. But never have
I read about a test of a specific CM10k-setting at longer
time controls with matches of 50 games vs 8-10 non CM-engines
(total 400-500 games). And as long as this work has not be
done, nobody will be able to conclude something concrete
about real strenght of a CM10k-setting. The only thing we
have done is a test CM10k-default over 410 games (40'/40)
vs 15 others engines, see at http://www.utzingerk.com/cm10k.htm
Best regards
Kurt
so the CM10th settings in
>this tournament could be bettered yet.
>
>Graham.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.