Author: James Swafford
Date: 07:04:41 05/09/05
Go up one level in this thread
I am glad you asked this question. I've always used 250 it's worked out ok, but I've never proven to myself that 250 is a safe bound. Is anybody using a hard limit > 250? On May 08, 2005 at 23:44:31, Andrew Shapira wrote: >What's best known (the smallest) upper bound on the number of legal moves, taken >over all chess positions? An obvious bound is 9*7*4+2*14+2*14+2*8+8 = 332. >This comes from 9 queens, 2 rooks, 2 bishops, 2 knights, and 1 king. Is a >better bound known?
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.