Author: Graham Banks
Date: 07:27:59 05/09/05
Go up one level in this thread
On May 09, 2005 at 09:52:33, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On May 09, 2005 at 06:03:59, Graham Banks wrote: > >>On May 09, 2005 at 05:35:02, Clive Munro wrote: >> >>>Graham >>> >>>I am very surprised at how well the Chessmaster program is doing against the top >>>opposition! Are all the unique settings better than the default setting? >>> >>>Clive >> >>I would say that all the CM9000 and CM10th settings in this tournament are >>better than the Default settings. >>The CM9000 settings in this tournament are the cream of the crop! >>CM10th settings are still being rigorously tested, > > Hi Graham > Where can such tests be found? I only know from testing > CM-settings vs CM-settings, or knockout tournament over > only 20 games per match and a trial by Jason to test > various CM-settings against Shredder 9. But never have > I read about a test of a specific CM10k-setting at longer > time controls with matches of 50 games vs 8-10 non CM-engines > (total 400-500 games). And as long as this work has not be > done, nobody will be able to conclude something concrete > about real strenght of a CM10k-setting. The only thing we > have done is a test CM10k-default over 410 games (40'/40) > vs 15 others engines, see at http://www.utzingerk.com/cm10k.htm > Best regards > Kurt > >so the CM10th settings in >>this tournament could be bettered yet. >> >>Graham. Hi Kurt, Ray is in the process of running CM10th settings against other top engines (280 games each setting at 40 moves in 40 minutes as per his CM9000 testing. Jason is running CM10th settings in matches against Shredder 9. And for those interested in CM v CM, there's my CM10th Showdown. Be patient :-) Regards, Graham.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.