Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: WCSAC.0107

Author: Dann Corbit

Date: 14:43:17 05/09/05

Go up one level in this thread

On May 09, 2005 at 17:24:36, martin fierz wrote:

>On May 09, 2005 at 14:54:54, Steven Edwards wrote:
>
>>WCSAC.0107:
>
>forget it - WCSAC is no good. use ECMGCP instead...

It is still interesting to debug the test suite.

After his efforts, we will have a better understanding of this particular set.

I expect every test suite will always have bugs in it until we drive every
position all the way forward to formal proof of the outcome.

I think that WAC is probably the most carefully debugged, but I am also sure
that there are bugs still in it.

• Re: WCSAC.0107 martin fierz 02:07:12 05/10/05
  • Re: WCSAC.0107 Steven Edwards 02:22:57 05/10/05
    • Re: WCSAC.0107 martin fierz 07:50:33 05/10/05
      • Re: WCSAC.0107 Dann Corbit 07:55:43 05/10/05

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.