Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 17:05:49 05/10/05
Go up one level in this thread
to Andy and possible others. Please do NOT think that I want to become expert in computerchess - I am not! But until the case against Patriot 2 and its author finally decided PLEASE give freedom for all possible arguments or opinions. Perhaps in the end I will be proven wrong, but this is my own problem. But I don't want attend a whitchhunting against a young talent. Until now things could be explained. But after a final condemnation nobody would be able to argue in favor of this author. If in the end the main "crime" is the marketing of the program, we should not focus on the programmer alone. Perhaps he didn't know all the details for making a clone in the end. Perhaps he believed that he took certain models and lost himself in wishful thinking. Please don't give your verdict until the last excuse could be given for all kind of data... To all: Don't worry about me. For me the proof wasn't a proof and until now I'm not able to understand OTHER evidence that does exist but is only known to real experts. Best to all, Rolf
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.