Author: Sune Fischer
Date: 02:43:27 05/11/05
Go up one level in this thread
On May 11, 2005 at 05:20:38, Uri Blass wrote: >I think that people care too much about speed differences. You could be right, still I can't help myself if I see something that can be done faster/better/smarter I must do it :) Whether this is in improved search, eval or direct speed doesn't matter to me, I don't work with taboos like that - I'll take it where I can get it! :) If you know you don't care about games with 30 queens, then I see no reason not to take advantage of that if you get the right idea. >The important thing is the algorithm. >I believe that it is possible to use the same algorithm and handling every >position without being more than 2 times slower and an engine that can beat >shredder9 with 2:1 time handicap is a very strong engine that can be >commercial(I believe that most of the commercial programs cannot do it). To me search and eval are the two major things, number three is speed. -S.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.