Author: Peter Skinner
Date: 05:03:11 05/12/05
Go up one level in this thread
On May 12, 2005 at 07:35:58, WAEL DEEB wrote: >Hi Peter, >an interesting story indeed....thanx :-) >BTW,your post has reminded me of the release of Hiarcs 9 last year and the >pirate versions which were cerculating the net....actually they were also a hex >editted versions of Hiarcs 9 and a lot of people who downloaded such versions >were very disappointed from the performance of the "new" Hiarcs 9!! >Such posts are here in our forum from last year.... >Cheers, >Dr.Wael Deeb Yes I remember quite a few of the "Hiarcs 9" posts last year before it was released. Just as the Shredder 9 posts earlier when people were using Deep Shredder 9 on a single processor system. Why would you pay an extra $50 for a multi cpu program when you only have a single and still to this day not have a dual and _still_ test on the exact same system? It was unfortunate to see who was posting the results as well. Some "respected" members who do engine matches and post the results here are nothing more than pirates. It is a shame really... Personally I couldn't care less about the Shredder 9 pirate users, but Mark (Hiarcs) has never done anything wrong but try to improve. Peter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.