Author: Peter Fendrich
Date: 05:28:20 05/12/05
Go up one level in this thread
On May 12, 2005 at 08:03:11, Peter Skinner wrote: >On May 12, 2005 at 07:35:58, WAEL DEEB wrote: > >>Hi Peter, >>an interesting story indeed....thanx :-) >>BTW,your post has reminded me of the release of Hiarcs 9 last year and the >>pirate versions which were cerculating the net....actually they were also a hex >>editted versions of Hiarcs 9 and a lot of people who downloaded such versions >>were very disappointed from the performance of the "new" Hiarcs 9!! >>Such posts are here in our forum from last year.... >>Cheers, >>Dr.Wael Deeb > >Yes I remember quite a few of the "Hiarcs 9" posts last year before it was >released. > >Just as the Shredder 9 posts earlier when people were using Deep Shredder 9 on a >single processor system. Why would you pay an extra $50 for a multi cpu program >when you only have a single and still to this day not have a dual and _still_ >test on the exact same system? > >It was unfortunate to see who was posting the results as well. Some "respected" >members who do engine matches and post the results here are nothing more than >pirates. It is a shame really... > >Personally I couldn't care less about the Shredder 9 pirate users, but Mark >(Hiarcs) has never done anything wrong but try to improve. > >Peter Hmmm, what wrong did Stefan Meyer-Kahlen do to deserve pirates? /Peter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.