Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 15:10:53 05/13/05
Go up one level in this thread
On May 13, 2005 at 18:06:49, Christopher Conkie wrote: >Hi Dann, > >Thank you for taking the time to do these tests. > >I was thinking about the results from a very early verion of Arevno. > >One that came from 1999. > >I wondered if that would provide insight. > >I'm not implying these two but when I perform these kinds of tests I try where >possible to do so with chronologically similar versions. > >That would mean an very early version of Averno (maybe even the first version). > >Things get changed along the road to originality. > >Still I can see your point with the latest version. > >Back in time is where I want to/do go. > >When things were more the same. I have the literal source code of all the averno versions up to 0.40, along with each public version of the SKAKI code. I did look at the evaluation functions for both engines for each version of the source that I have. They do not resemble each other at all. The similar score is one of pure coincidence.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.