Author: Joshua Haglund
Date: 22:06:41 05/13/05
Go up one level in this thread
On May 13, 2005 at 22:48:44, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On May 13, 2005 at 19:21:37, Joshua Haglund wrote: > >>On May 13, 2005 at 13:48:27, Pablo Ignacio Restrepo wrote: >> >>>Hello Robert >>>It was a mistake in redaction. Antiajedrez or Antichess have been my extreme >>>anticomputer style, across I have won many times many top engines in all time >>>game control. But usually Crafty have been for me a real problem for beat, iqual >>>than Rufian, Tiger Gambit 2.0 , Quark ..... >>>Usually I am playing into playchess. There I have won many top engines, but to >>>repeat..... Craftuy have ben very strong, but today in morning look ...... 2 >>>easy draw. Why? >>>Regard, >>>Pablo >> >> >>Hello Pablo, >> >>I've told you a couple times, if you remember, Dr. Hyatt removed the stone-wall >>detection code in version 19.15. It was removed because it appeared to Dr. Hyatt >>it wasn't needed anymore. >> >>As a result it should be easier for you using "anti-chess" playing Crafty. >> >>Joshua Haglund >>toneewa@yahoo.com > > >If I looked at the game correctly, this wasn't a stonewall type problem, it was >just e4 Nf3 and Bc4 for white if I am recalling the right game (I have looked at >several today so that could be wrong). [D]k1/2rbp1pp/1p3p1r/p2P1P2/P1P1B1P1/1P2R2P/5NK1 b - - 0 121 [D]n3/2rr1q1k/1p1p1p1p/p1p1pPpP/4P2N/P1PP2Q1/1P3PRK/6R1 b - - 0 38 These are to me "stone-wall" positions. I don't know how Crafty use to detect the "stone wall"... by pawn formation positions or by recognition of particular moves; maybe both. Pablo use to play Crafty and have not much luck before the removal of the "stone-wall" detection. Joshua Haglund toneewa@yahoo.com
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.