Author: Micheal Cummings
Date: 05:27:04 02/08/99
Go up one level in this thread
On February 08, 1999 at 05:00:18, Bert Seifriz wrote: >On February 07, 1999 at 22:24:30, Micheal Cummings wrote: > >> >>On February 07, 1999 at 11:03:09, Bert Seifriz wrote: >> >>>On February 07, 1999 at 09:02:00, blass uri wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>On February 07, 1999 at 07:19:57, Bert Seifriz wrote: >>>> >>>This is what I am talking about. Bert >> >> >>As I have stated before I love Rebel 10, And if you read what I wrote about >>Clodra and the SSDF I mention that these games were not played on equal >>hardware, nothing else. >> >>If I love CM6K so much then why am I playing Rebel 10 on a machine that is >>better and faster than the one CM6K. >> >>Do you have anything to do with Gambitsoft, I remember saying something about >>having a problem with something that was got from their by one of my freinds and >>I think you wrong a post back and had a go at my about it. >> >I did not want to insult you or anybody else. >If you feel like this I would apologize! I am not a defender >of any program. I only think when you change important defaults >of any program you should mention that when you post a result. >And I remember the Clodra tournament discussion here. I am not >diving into the archives, but I know exactly how the results >were treated in here and by whom. I was not a participant there >either, but I thought it to be greatly unjust to put some >of the best German computer tournament experts into a corner of >idiots. > My game I posted was not to mislead anyone, I did say when the first reply post came out that I did forget to put all details. Which I later corrected, but were taken by you that I was misleading people, this was not the case. It would be hard for me to try and put past people that one of the best chess programs in the world would make a move that it is not programmed to make and expect for this to go over the heads of everyone here. This game has nothing to do with how strong Rebel 10 is in comparison to CM6K, just that I want to know how strong the engine is when faced with openings that it was not programmed to make. I think if a engine is strong then it should be able to handle itself in these cases well. >Is this your way of getting back at me about comments I make about certain >>tournament > >Yes! And I still stand by my comments about the SSDF and Clodra. I feel that especially with clodra, that playing games on such a variety of strong machines against ones played on more weaker machines and then to post results on here saying this program won is also misleading. It was only by other poster saying that a certain program did very well considered it was played on a very weak machine that I even knew what was going on. I cannot remember if you posted these results or someone else, but who ever did left a huge bit of information. Just like when I posted my results with information missing that makes things look very misleading. > > and queries I made about Gambit ? Like I said I think this may have been you, but I was wrong > >No, because I am not aware of any. >Kind regards, Bert
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.