Author: stuart taylor
Date: 09:16:56 05/15/05
Go up one level in this thread
On May 15, 2005 at 11:25:12, Uri Blass wrote: >On May 15, 2005 at 10:44:49, stuart taylor wrote: > >>On May 15, 2005 at 09:13:24, Klaus Wlotzka wrote: >> >>How can this be? Is this really true? What's the catch? >>Maybe we are speaking only of Blitz? Maybe some other top engines were absent? >>Or what? >>S.Taylor > >Time control is 10 minutes per game+10 seconds per move and the hardware is >more than twice faster than ssdf hardware. > >It seems to be about 3 times faster time control than the ssdf games. > >I do not know the rating of Shredder9 at 120/40 and I cannot say that it is >impossible that it is also 100 elo better at 120/40 time control. > >The fact that it had problems against Junior proves nothing because a program >may have problems against one opponent. > >Uri Doesn't it mean that there is some "weakness" somewhere? Not a big weakness, but something, which Shredder 7.04 could cope with better, and COULD also be added to this engine(Shredder 9)? So there are things which Shredder 7.04 does better, AND things which Junior 9 does better (because it is something which tips the ballance, from the other things in which _Junior_ is weaker). S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.