Author: Uri Blass
Date: 09:32:26 05/15/05
Go up one level in this thread
On May 15, 2005 at 11:59:16, Klaus Wlotzka wrote: >On May 15, 2005 at 11:42:09, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On May 15, 2005 at 11:21:21, Klaus Wlotzka wrote: >> >>>If you haven't noticed it yet, Shredder 9 UCI doesn't play only in the >>>CSS-computer rating list in another league. >>> >>>The difference of 100 Elo is relatively surely high. However, this lies well >>>that "Shredder" likes short time controls. Furthermore "Shredder" copes with >>>almost every opening system. Since there play at the CSS-computer rating list >>>without books but with 10 modified SeE- positions, this yields broader >>>advantages for "Shredder". >>> >>>Klaus Wlotzka >> >> >>I think that this test is more interesting for me >>I am more interested in testing that is done in that way and I hope that they >>will test next version of Movei. >> >>I do not understand how they choose engines to test(for example I see Jonny2.64 >>that did not aualify and I do not see Jonny2.75). >> >>Uri > > >Hello Uri, > >a complete test run with an engine (480 games) lasts for always about 2 weeks. >It can therefore last sometimes up to a year till it is a new version's turn >again. So also at Jonny. > >I am testing "Spike 0.9a" at the moment, the following tests are planned after >this: > >a.) Zappa 1.0 >b.) Little Goliath Evolution > >I don't know whether Movei already plays so strongly to qualify for the >CSS-computer rating list. I will look at the previous test reports more >closely. > >Klaus In that case there is at least a month before testing Movei in case that you test it after Little Goliath Evolution and I hope to have better Movei at that time to be strong enough for the list. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.