Author: Klaus Wlotzka
Date: 13:26:40 05/15/05
Go up one level in this thread
On May 15, 2005 at 15:48:36, gerold daniels wrote: >On May 15, 2005 at 13:07:32, Klaus Wlotzka wrote: > >>On May 15, 2005 at 12:32:26, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On May 15, 2005 at 11:59:16, Klaus Wlotzka wrote: >>> >>>>On May 15, 2005 at 11:42:09, Uri Blass wrote: >>>> >>>>>On May 15, 2005 at 11:21:21, Klaus Wlotzka wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>If you haven't noticed it yet, Shredder 9 UCI doesn't play only in the >>>>>>CSS-computer rating list in another league. >>>>>> >>>>>>The difference of 100 Elo is relatively surely high. However, this lies well >>>>>>that "Shredder" likes short time controls. Furthermore "Shredder" copes with >>>>>>almost every opening system. Since there play at the CSS-computer rating list >>>>>>without books but with 10 modified SeE- positions, this yields broader >>>>>>advantages for "Shredder". >>>>>> >>>>>>Klaus Wlotzka >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>I think that this test is more interesting for me >>>>>I am more interested in testing that is done in that way and I hope that they >>>>>will test next version of Movei. >>>>> >>>>>I do not understand how they choose engines to test(for example I see Jonny2.64 >>>>>that did not aualify and I do not see Jonny2.75). >>>>> >>>>>Uri >>>> >>>> >>>>Hello Uri, >>>> >>>>a complete test run with an engine (480 games) lasts for always about 2 weeks. >>>>It can therefore last sometimes up to a year till it is a new version's turn >>>>again. So also at Jonny. >>>> >>>>I am testing "Spike 0.9a" at the moment, the following tests are planned after >>>>this: >>>> >>>>a.) Zappa 1.0 >>>>b.) Little Goliath Evolution >>>> >>>>I don't know whether Movei already plays so strongly to qualify for the >>>>CSS-computer rating list. I will look at the previous test reports more >>>>closely. >>>> >>>>Klaus >>> >>>In that case there is at least a month before testing Movei in case that you >>>test it after Little Goliath Evolution and I hope to have better Movei at that >>>time to be strong enough for the list. >>> >>>Uri >> >>Hello Uri, >> >>I have looked at the rating list of "Leo Dijksman", "Movei" stands approximately >>on a level with "Little Goliath" there. I will parallel test Movei with "Little >>Goliath". This would be approximately in three weeks. I use a short test for it. >>The short test works so: >> >>To, in future, find possible new candidates faster who shows a sufficient >>playing strength for the qualification into the CSS-computer rating list new >>engines will unite short test undergone for the time being. The test candidate >>plays all 10 opening specification positions against all engines put in the >>current rating list after the following scheme: >> >>a.) opening specification positions 1-3 against the engines of rank 1-8 >>b.) opening specification positions 4-6 against the engines of rank 9-16 >>c.) opening specification positions 7-10 against the engines of rank 17-24 >> >>After this scheme a test run arises with altogether 168 games. This should reach >>to a first playing strength assessment. The candidate reaches a score in the >>area of the engine put on rank 25 becomes the test continual, otherwise a >>demolition is carried out. The results of the candidate are listed at >>demolition in the "eternal rating list". >> >> >>Therefore, if you still publish a more current engine within the next 3 weeks, >>then I would like to test the newer one of course. >> >>You also can send me an e-mail. You find my address here: >>http://www.wlotzka-computerschach.de/ >> >>Yours sincerely >> >>Klaus > >good afternoon Klaus. goliath LGE is a pretty strong engine it will certainly >be a good test for movei. > >gerold. Hi Gerold, The predecesser engine "Little Goliath revival" couldn't last in the CSS-computer rating list. I am curious whether with "Little Goliath evolution" an increase has been successful. I am curious also at "Movei" whether the qualification turns out well. Klaus
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.