Author: Uri Blass
Date: 01:14:51 05/16/05
Go up one level in this thread
On May 16, 2005 at 04:04:26, Klaus Wlotzka wrote: >On May 15, 2005 at 18:48:55, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On May 15, 2005 at 16:26:40, Klaus Wlotzka wrote: >> >>>On May 15, 2005 at 15:48:36, gerold daniels wrote: >>> >>>>On May 15, 2005 at 13:07:32, Klaus Wlotzka wrote: >>>> >>>>>On May 15, 2005 at 12:32:26, Uri Blass wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On May 15, 2005 at 11:59:16, Klaus Wlotzka wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On May 15, 2005 at 11:42:09, Uri Blass wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On May 15, 2005 at 11:21:21, Klaus Wlotzka wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>If you haven't noticed it yet, Shredder 9 UCI doesn't play only in the >>>>>>>>>CSS-computer rating list in another league. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>The difference of 100 Elo is relatively surely high. However, this lies well >>>>>>>>>that "Shredder" likes short time controls. Furthermore "Shredder" copes with >>>>>>>>>almost every opening system. Since there play at the CSS-computer rating list >>>>>>>>>without books but with 10 modified SeE- positions, this yields broader >>>>>>>>>advantages for "Shredder". >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Klaus Wlotzka >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>I think that this test is more interesting for me >>>>>>>>I am more interested in testing that is done in that way and I hope that they >>>>>>>>will test next version of Movei. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>I do not understand how they choose engines to test(for example I see Jonny2.64 >>>>>>>>that did not aualify and I do not see Jonny2.75). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Uri >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Hello Uri, >>>>>>> >>>>>>>a complete test run with an engine (480 games) lasts for always about 2 weeks. >>>>>>>It can therefore last sometimes up to a year till it is a new version's turn >>>>>>>again. So also at Jonny. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>I am testing "Spike 0.9a" at the moment, the following tests are planned after >>>>>>>this: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>a.) Zappa 1.0 >>>>>>>b.) Little Goliath Evolution >>>>>>> >>>>>>>I don't know whether Movei already plays so strongly to qualify for the >>>>>>>CSS-computer rating list. I will look at the previous test reports more >>>>>>>closely. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Klaus >>>>>> >>>>>>In that case there is at least a month before testing Movei in case that you >>>>>>test it after Little Goliath Evolution and I hope to have better Movei at that >>>>>>time to be strong enough for the list. >>>>>> >>>>>>Uri >>>>> >>>>>Hello Uri, >>>>> >>>>>I have looked at the rating list of "Leo Dijksman", "Movei" stands approximately >>>>>on a level with "Little Goliath" there. I will parallel test Movei with "Little >>>>>Goliath". This would be approximately in three weeks. I use a short test for it. >>>>>The short test works so: >>>>> >>>>>To, in future, find possible new candidates faster who shows a sufficient >>>>>playing strength for the qualification into the CSS-computer rating list new >>>>>engines will unite short test undergone for the time being. The test candidate >>>>>plays all 10 opening specification positions against all engines put in the >>>>>current rating list after the following scheme: >>>>> >>>>>a.) opening specification positions 1-3 against the engines of rank 1-8 >>>>>b.) opening specification positions 4-6 against the engines of rank 9-16 >>>>>c.) opening specification positions 7-10 against the engines of rank 17-24 >>>>> >>>>>After this scheme a test run arises with altogether 168 games. This should reach >>>>>to a first playing strength assessment. The candidate reaches a score in the >>>>>area of the engine put on rank 25 becomes the test continual, otherwise a >>>>>demolition is carried out. The results of the candidate are listed at >>>>>demolition in the "eternal rating list". >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Therefore, if you still publish a more current engine within the next 3 weeks, >>>>>then I would like to test the newer one of course. >>>>> >>>>>You also can send me an e-mail. You find my address here: >>>>>http://www.wlotzka-computerschach.de/ >>>>> >>>>>Yours sincerely >>>>> >>>>>Klaus >>>> >>>>good afternoon Klaus. goliath LGE is a pretty strong engine it will certainly >>>>be a good test for movei. >>>> >>>>gerold. >>> >>>Hi Gerold, >>> >>>The predecesser engine "Little Goliath revival" couldn't last in the >>>CSS-computer rating list. I am curious whether with "Little Goliath evolution" >>>an increase has been successful. I am curious also at "Movei" whether the >>>qualification turns out well. >>> >>>Klaus >> >>I am sure of nothing but I guess that Movei of today is not strong enough to >>qualify but 50 elo improvement in it are enough to qualify and I am optimistic >>about improvements. >> >>Uri > >Hello Uri, > >think you it would be better that I still wait a little with the test? > >Klaus Yes If I understand correctly you plan to test first zappa and Little goliath evolution. First results of Little goliath evolution are not good and it has only 1/7 in http://f22.parsimony.net/forum41668/messages/40032.htm Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.