Author: stuart taylor
Date: 10:06:16 05/16/05
Go up one level in this thread
On May 15, 2005 at 16:04:25, gerold daniels wrote: >On May 15, 2005 at 11:25:12, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On May 15, 2005 at 10:44:49, stuart taylor wrote: >> >>>On May 15, 2005 at 09:13:24, Klaus Wlotzka wrote: >>> >>>How can this be? Is this really true? What's the catch? >>>Maybe we are speaking only of Blitz? Maybe some other top engines were absent? >>>Or what? >>>S.Taylor >> >>Time control is 10 minutes per game+10 seconds per move and the hardware is >>more than twice faster than ssdf hardware. >> >>It seems to be about 3 times faster time control than the ssdf games. >> >>I do not know the rating of Shredder9 at 120/40 and I cannot say that it is >>impossible that it is also 100 elo better at 120/40 time control. >> >>The fact that it had problems against Junior proves nothing because a program >>may have problems against one opponent. >> >>Uri > >good afternoon Uri. Sedat has shredder 9 104 points above junior 9 in his latest >tourney. 60 min.10 sec. > >gerold. THAT wasn't being disputed! An actual match between the two is hard for Shredder 9. (Even though Shredder 7.04 crushes Junior 9). S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.