Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Dr. Robert Hyatt Computer Question.

Author: Pablo Ignacio Restrepo

Date: 15:51:15 05/17/05

Go up one level in this thread


Dr Robert Hyatt.

I am trying to imagine, what could be the close future, maybe at lest in the 10
next years, for many Top engines.
FIRST POSIBILITY. If chess computer-programmers of many Top engines, like, for
example, Chess Master, Hiarcs, Rebel, Fritz, Shredder, Junior, etc, don’t fix
and modified the engines, these engines are going to continue being or having a
great power in the standard settings like the power of a Top GM and more power
in Ortodhox lines, but these engines are going to continue being an easy an
simple opponent to beat in all time control games, across antichess technique.
SECOND POSIBILITY. If chess computer-programmers of many Top engines try to fix
the engine across modification of value of pawns opponent (more value for pawn
opponent), for example, these engines that will be fixing, will be losing in the
battle against other engines that wont be modified.
THIRD POSIBILITY. All Top engines are going to have a special setting
ANTI-HUMAN. But I wonder: What are going to make the chess programmers with the
estándar setting? Won’t fix this?  And when human beings put the engine in the
PC where are going to be open the engines, in what setting?
FORTH POSIBILITY. Everybody to forgot and to ignore the problem (antichess) and
to continue building engines that be as strong as a dragon and as fool as a
chicken. Now… Human beings finally are going to play against the chicken at lest
to be studied and suicide, and human beings are going to forget the dragon
combat, at lest that human beings only want to be into a fight and chess train.
FIFHT POSIBILITY.  But I wonder … What are going to be happening with Top Man Vs
Machine Challengers? Are they going to introduce a modification to the classic
chess parameters by pressure of amateur development?
D Robert Hyatt. In order with the last ideas… What do you think about the
antichess problem? It is very important to understand that it is not the same
the antichess technique that the IM Levy concept. Antichess is an extreme way
that can easy be use systematically against top engines to win.
It is an extreme way that only could be destroying across the wall destruction.
Will be the wall to knock down and the human being that want to play just in the
first 3 lines beating?
Best regard,
Pablo Restrepo



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.