Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Ignoring the screams of the Anonymous Poster (no Profile)

Author: Komputer Korner

Date: 18:54:04 05/17/05

Go up one level in this thread


On May 17, 2005 at 18:51:00, chandler yergin wrote:

>On May 17, 2005 at 17:35:57, Komputer Korner wrote:
>
>>On May 17, 2005 at 10:47:55, chandler yergin wrote:
>>
>>>The ChessBase Opening Key using ECO Classifications.
>>>
>>>for Example:
>>>
>>>THe MEGA DATABASE '99 CD is based on 1114444 Games
>>>
>>>has 54277 Keys and 56004 Positions.
>>>
>>>The Chessbase Big Database 2004 CD has 2607363 Games
>>>
>>>with 91638 Opening Keys and 87,000 + positions.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>This is why the game is played backwards; to get the deepest
>>>
>>>Classification possible.
>>
>>What does classification have to do  with backsolving?
>
>What don't you understand about this?
>"This is why the game is played backwards; to get the deepest
>Classification possible."
>
>Hmmm?


I am defining backsolving as the feature that Mike Leahy gives you in Bookup and
that is found in CPT and Chess Assistant and others. You seem to insist on the
general definition of backsolving as working backwards through the tree. This
thread started with my definition, so please accept that definition in this
thread.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.