Author: Joshua Haglund
Date: 00:56:34 05/18/05
Go up one level in this thread
On May 18, 2005 at 01:43:11, Uri Blass wrote: >On May 17, 2005 at 15:57:13, Pablo Ignacio Restrepo wrote: > >>Dear Chess Comunity: >> >> >>Since many time ago, I have been out of the usual chess-engines way. >>To beat Top engines is really a easy Job. >>Just it is necesary to play antichess technique. >>Some years ago, I was thinking "if the Queen is a real and necesary counter for >>human beings chess game work." >>Now I am in new way of investigation, where finally I have discover how to beat >>engines playing as a human being 100% and without Queen, since first moves. >>This is an example of my first investigation of the day May 17 2005. >> >>Best Regard, >>Pablo >>NOTE. I would like to have a great evaluation an analisis from this game for >>each expert here. Bitte !!! > >This can be easily prevented if the program plays faster when it has a queen >advantage or if there is an increasement. > >I doubt if you can get even a draw after sacrificing the queen with 1 second >increasement. > >Maybe you can do it but maybe the program will win very slowly but win the game. > >Uri What I've done experimentally against Pablo "Father" was increase the decrease the time usage by 400-900%. It used time pressure on him, versus the other way around. This caused blunders if I were lucky :) 2 or so years later, I don't think this would work as well against Pablo today. He's improved :) I've posted a game awhile ago, between me and Shredder 9. I was about 8.00 points down and of course it was an anti-chess closed position. Shredder avoided the 50 move rule by sacrafice of his bishop and queen, if I remember right. Shredder resigned after the blunders. This is seen in both S8 & S9 to avoid 50-move rule, especially pawn advancements. Joshua Haglund toneewa@yahoo.com
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.