Author: Drexel,Michael
Date: 03:48:56 05/18/05
Go up one level in this thread
On May 18, 2005 at 02:01:11, Dann Corbit wrote:
>On May 17, 2005 at 07:31:11, WAEL DEEB wrote:
>
>>....is a cheap way to beat the engine!
>>It's a method to make the engine goes crazy several times and loose on time!
>>Sorry Father,you can't impress me....
>>Your wins are more likely a Grandfather play :-)
>
>Actually, winning at blitz against a computer is more impressive than at 40/2
>(or even more so at correspondence time control).
It is only impressive if the human was able to outplay the computer.
Wins on time are not very impressive.
YMMV
>
>Computers will hit the exponential wall at some point and basically "make almost
>no progress" at slow time control.
>
>At blitz, the computer will make new depth in a very short time.
>
>At lightning, the computer will dominate.
Lightning games between Computers and humans on chess servers are BS anyway.
A computer is directly connected to the Server, the Human Brain isn't.
Michael
>
>At G/10 seconds, I think a good program on a fast computer would {should?} never
>lose.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.