Author: Steve B
Date: 06:40:30 05/18/05
Go up one level in this thread
On May 18, 2005 at 09:29:45, Clive Munro wrote: > >>even 5 games at 30 min is over 5 hours of testing >>i simply dont have alot of time to do more then that >> >Well Steve I understand what you are saying. However after waiting so long for >it I would want to test it more fully especially as you own the R40. You may be >the only person on this planet who has both M/Cs and people like me would love >to see these two go head to head. Might I suggest a 10 game in 60 match? It is >only a couple of hours a game and you could take your time to do it. well lets see.. thats at least 20 hours of testing that would take me probably a month if i did nothing else in my spare time and by that time the Resurrection will be revised several times to make this test almost worhtless i will go with the 5 game match and perhaps some longer games later Please don’t condemn this M/C to your vault without proper testing to claim its >right as the "Strongest dedicated" chess computer. i never put a computer away and never play it again..ever..even the early weaker units i manage to play all of my computers through out the year the chief difference is I play the computers and generally am not interested in computer VS computer matches in almost all cases the stronger unit wins and so i personally see no point to it i will leave scientific elo calculations to those with the inclination and time to do accurate Elo assestments my interest in the hobby is to collect and play them for myself Best Steve
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.