Author: Pablo Ignacio Restrepo
Date: 11:20:51 05/18/05
Go up one level in this thread
Hello Evengy Shu Chessbase have never written anything about antichess like never has been written by (V.I.J.) very important journalist. The games I have been playing since 2002 have been sistematically ingnored by very important magazines, becouse they dont like to wrotte the truth. For example a magazine like New York time never will be writting about my victories or draws against Hydra. They are going to write about games of Masters, because this is the way or direction like the World to build the atmosphera Man vs. Machine challenger($$$$$$$$$$$$$$$=). Fortunately there are warriors people like many I have find here in the forum. But finally you can be sure that to be recognized it is a not important thing. Regards, Pablo On May 18, 2005 at 13:34:09, Evgeny Shu wrote: >Hi , >I would only like to pay your attention that the "new invented" technique is >well known. >I would also like to mention that acouple of years ago there was an article on >chessbase.com with explanation, games and diagrams! >The opening is exactly the same .. or it can go c4 e3 f4 and so on.. > >So of course you are doing a good job implementing the well known technique :) > >Also many engines don't understand why sacrifice a knight on g5 square so you >can open h line for an attack - I suggest to try that one , more interesting to >play then Bd1-Be2-Bd1 ... (well maybe shredder - in some cases) > >Good luck :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.