Author: Evgeny Shu
Date: 12:28:36 05/18/05
Go up one level in this thread
Hi , My respect to your victories and to the draws against Hydra :) I haven't seen any wins against it but I will take your word for it. Although I have read an article on a chessbase site a few years ago , it is hard to find now and we all understand such an article is not a "good" commercial .. Maybe someone on the forum has a link to it and will share with us - just for a fun. Now let me get the point , The technique is well known , the autors try to avoid the problem , we try to exploit it . I am sure many of us could show couple of games against best engines on icc with a draw (a win is harder of course), so I don't see what's the all buzz about. Let us challenge you though :) Try a 60 1 time control game , sac the Q, and THEN win a game :) draw would be normal result in _some cases_ , although if I would be the author , I wouldn't be to happy with it.. (so no draw !) Now that would be a serious bug. What do you think ? On May 18, 2005 at 14:20:51, Pablo Ignacio Restrepo wrote: > >Hello Evengy Shu > >Chessbase have never written anything about antichess like never has been >written by (V.I.J.) very important journalist. > >The games I have been playing since 2002 have been sistematically ingnored by >very important magazines, becouse they dont like to wrotte the truth. >For example a magazine like New York time never will be writting about my >victories or draws against Hydra. > >They are going to write about games of Masters, because this is the way or >direction like the World to build the atmosphera Man vs. Machine >challenger($$$$$$$$$$$$$$$=). >Fortunately there are warriors people like many I have find here in the forum. >But finally you can be sure that to be recognized it is a not important thing. >Regards, >Pablo > > >On May 18, 2005 at 13:34:09, Evgeny Shu wrote: > >>Hi , >>I would only like to pay your attention that the "new invented" technique is >>well known. >>I would also like to mention that acouple of years ago there was an article on >>chessbase.com with explanation, games and diagrams! >>The opening is exactly the same .. or it can go c4 e3 f4 and so on.. >> >>So of course you are doing a good job implementing the well known technique :) >> >>Also many engines don't understand why sacrifice a knight on g5 square so you >>can open h line for an attack - I suggest to try that one , more interesting to >>play then Bd1-Be2-Bd1 ... (well maybe shredder - in some cases) >> >>Good luck :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.