Author: Pablo Ignacio Restrepo
Date: 13:33:32 05/18/05
Go up one level in this thread
Hello Evgeny Shu Thanks for your answer. Agree! I have recibed games of 100% amateurs, like to play the same antichess, and where they was not teaching about the technique. Human beings have the same brain and is probably and history have proved that, that a same technique have been invented but diferents people in diferent places and diferent times. About antichess(extreme blocking style playing in first three lines) maybe many people made that at the same time in diferent places. In the last way, is truth that many people can beat engines, Masters, and Ameteurus. In my own opinion a since 1300 FIDE chess player can beat the WCCC( World Chess Champion Machine in all rtime control with or without time incremental), if the human being have a previous strong instruction about the antichess knowlodge. In my humbble opinion across what I have learned about that, I coul win the WCCC in long time control playing without Queen, across a sacrifice in the move 3 changed the similar brian On May 18, 2005 at 15:28:36, Evgeny Shu wrote: >Hi , >My respect to your victories and to the draws against Hydra :) >I haven't seen any wins against it but I will take your word for it. > >Although I have read an article on a chessbase site a few years ago , it is hard >to find now and we all understand such an article is not a "good" commercial .. >Maybe someone on the forum has a link to it and will share with us - just for a >fun. > >Now let me get the point , >The technique is well known , the autors try to avoid the problem , we try to >exploit it . I am sure many of us could show couple of games against best >engines on icc with a draw (a win is harder of course), so I don't see what's >the all buzz about. > >Let us challenge you though :) > >Try a 60 1 time control game , >sac the Q, >and THEN win a game :) > >draw would be normal result in _some cases_ , although if I would be the author >, I wouldn't be to happy with it.. (so no draw !) > >Now that would be a serious bug. > >What do you think ? > > > > > > > > >On May 18, 2005 at 14:20:51, Pablo Ignacio Restrepo wrote: > >> >>Hello Evengy Shu >> >>Chessbase have never written anything about antichess like never has been >>written by (V.I.J.) very important journalist. >> >>The games I have been playing since 2002 have been sistematically ingnored by >>very important magazines, becouse they dont like to wrotte the truth. >>For example a magazine like New York time never will be writting about my >>victories or draws against Hydra. >> >>They are going to write about games of Masters, because this is the way or >>direction like the World to build the atmosphera Man vs. Machine >>challenger($$$$$$$$$$$$$$$=). >>Fortunately there are warriors people like many I have find here in the forum. >>But finally you can be sure that to be recognized it is a not important thing. >>Regards, >>Pablo >> >> >>On May 18, 2005 at 13:34:09, Evgeny Shu wrote: >> >>>Hi , >>>I would only like to pay your attention that the "new invented" technique is >>>well known. >>>I would also like to mention that acouple of years ago there was an article on >>>chessbase.com with explanation, games and diagrams! >>>The opening is exactly the same .. or it can go c4 e3 f4 and so on.. >>> >>>So of course you are doing a good job implementing the well known technique :) >>> >>>Also many engines don't understand why sacrifice a knight on g5 square so you >>>can open h line for an attack - I suggest to try that one , more interesting to >>>play then Bd1-Be2-Bd1 ... (well maybe shredder - in some cases) >>> >>>Good luck :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.