Author: Evgeny Shu
Date: 13:48:04 05/18/05
Go up one level in this thread
So I understand you accept the challenge and will demonstrate a win against hydra , playing long time control (60 1 at least) and sacrificing the queen for a bishop ? :) Note Hydra can be replaced with deep fritz 8 on dual 2.8+Ghz xeon machine for a start. On May 18, 2005 at 16:36:27, Pablo Ignacio Restrepo wrote: >Hello Evgeny Shu > >Thanks for your answer. >Agree! I have recibed games of 100% amateurs, like to play the same antichess, >and where they was not teaching about the technique. >Human beings have the same brain and is probably and history have proved that, >that a same technique have been invented but diferents people in diferent places >and diferent times. >About antichess(extreme blocking style playing in first three lines) maybe many >people made that at the same time in diferent places. >In the last way, is truth that many people can beat engines, Masters, and >Ameteurus. >In my own opinion a since 1300 FIDE chess player can beat the WCCC( World Chess >Champion Machine in all rtime control with or without time incremental), if the >human being have a previous strong instruction about the antichess knowlodge. >In my humbble opinion across what I have learned about that, I coul win the WCCC >in long time control playing without Queen, across a sacrifice in the move 3 >changed the Queen for the Queen-Bishop. > >Best regard Evgeny, >Pablo > >NOTE. >ICC is not a good place to play antichess becouse they to think that antichess >dont exist. Try to play in playachess engines room, the best of the best chess >Club in the Earth Planet. > > > > similar brian >On May 18, 2005 at 15:28:36, Evgeny Shu wrote: > >>Hi , >>My respect to your victories and to the draws against Hydra :) >>I haven't seen any wins against it but I will take your word for it. >> >>Although I have read an article on a chessbase site a few years ago , it is hard >>to find now and we all understand such an article is not a "good" commercial .. >>Maybe someone on the forum has a link to it and will share with us - just for a >>fun. >> >>Now let me get the point , >>The technique is well known , the autors try to avoid the problem , we try to >>exploit it . I am sure many of us could show couple of games against best >>engines on icc with a draw (a win is harder of course), so I don't see what's >>the all buzz about. >> >>Let us challenge you though :) >> >>Try a 60 1 time control game , >>sac the Q, >>and THEN win a game :) >> >>draw would be normal result in _some cases_ , although if I would be the author >>, I wouldn't be to happy with it.. (so no draw !) >> >>Now that would be a serious bug. >> >>What do you think ? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>On May 18, 2005 at 14:20:51, Pablo Ignacio Restrepo wrote: >> >>> >>>Hello Evengy Shu >>> >>>Chessbase have never written anything about antichess like never has been >>>written by (V.I.J.) very important journalist. >>> >>>The games I have been playing since 2002 have been sistematically ingnored by >>>very important magazines, becouse they dont like to wrotte the truth. >>>For example a magazine like New York time never will be writting about my >>>victories or draws against Hydra. >>> >>>They are going to write about games of Masters, because this is the way or >>>direction like the World to build the atmosphera Man vs. Machine >>>challenger($$$$$$$$$$$$$$$=). >>>Fortunately there are warriors people like many I have find here in the forum. >>>But finally you can be sure that to be recognized it is a not important thing. >>>Regards, >>>Pablo >>> >>> >>>On May 18, 2005 at 13:34:09, Evgeny Shu wrote: >>> >>>>Hi , >>>>I would only like to pay your attention that the "new invented" technique is >>>>well known. >>>>I would also like to mention that acouple of years ago there was an article on >>>>chessbase.com with explanation, games and diagrams! >>>>The opening is exactly the same .. or it can go c4 e3 f4 and so on.. >>>> >>>>So of course you are doing a good job implementing the well known technique :) >>>> >>>>Also many engines don't understand why sacrifice a knight on g5 square so you >>>>can open h line for an attack - I suggest to try that one , more interesting to >>>>play then Bd1-Be2-Bd1 ... (well maybe shredder - in some cases) >>>> >>>>Good luck :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.