Author: Eduard Nemeth
Date: 01:15:00 05/19/05
Go up one level in this thread
Hello Pablo!
My antichess is a another way than your. I wins not on time, I have killed
Programs with an short mate.
Here an example:
[Event "Blitz:5' MyTown"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "2003.01.18"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Nemeth,E"]
[Black "Fritz 8.005"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "C21"]
[Annotator "Eduard Nemeth"]
[PlyCount "47"]
[EventDate "2003.??.??"]
{64MB, Fritz7.ctg, P600} 1. e4 {0} e5 {0} 2. d4 {2} exd4 {0} 3. Bc4 {2} Nf6 {0}
4. a3 {2} Nc6 {-0.81/9 7} 5. g3 {3} Nxe4 {-1.81/10 10} 6. Bxf7+ {3} Kxf7 {
-2.47/10 9} 7. Qh5+ {2} Ke6 {-2.47/10 10} 8. Qg4+ {2} Kd5 {-2.47/9 5} 9. f3 {3}
Nd6 {-3.59/8 8} 10. c4+ {3} Kxc4 {-4.91/9 7} 11. b3+ {3} Kxb3 {-5.47/10 10} 12.
Bg5 {4} Qe8+ {-8.22/7 3} 13. Ne2 {9} Kb2 {-8.16/9 0} 14. Nbc3 {28} Kxa1 {
4.41/9 0} 15. Kd2+ {4} Kb2 {#9/8 4} 16. Rb1+ {3} Kxa3 {#9/8 9} 17. Ke1 {13}
Qxe2+ {#6/7 13} 18. Kxe2 {14} Nc4 {#5/5 14} 19. Bc1+ {3} Nb2 {#4/4 3} 20. Rxb2
{4} dxc3 {#3/4 4} 21. Rb4+ {11} Ka2 {#3/4 0} 22. Qc4+ {4} Ka1 {#2/3 4} 23.
Qxc3+ {3} Ka2 {#1/2 3} 24. Qb2# {5} 1-0
More games see here by Tim Krabbé (or you can "my best 100 PC games" download on
my Homepage:
http://www.beepworld.de/members37/computerschach/
under "Downloads"!
By Tim Krabbé:
http://www.xs4all.nl/~timkr/chess2/honor.htm
Have fun!
Eduard.
PS: ich warte auch auf Fritz 9, denn einige Varianten habe ich noch nicht
gezeigt. Das zeige ich erst beim Fritz 9.
On May 18, 2005 at 14:20:51, Pablo Ignacio Restrepo wrote:
>
>Hello Evengy Shu
>
>Chessbase have never written anything about antichess like never has been
>written by (V.I.J.) very important journalist.
>
>The games I have been playing since 2002 have been sistematically ingnored by
>very important magazines, becouse they dont like to wrotte the truth.
>For example a magazine like New York time never will be writting about my
>victories or draws against Hydra.
>
>They are going to write about games of Masters, because this is the way or
>direction like the World to build the atmosphera Man vs. Machine
>challenger($$$$$$$$$$$$$$$=).
>Fortunately there are warriors people like many I have find here in the forum.
>But finally you can be sure that to be recognized it is a not important thing.
>Regards,
>Pablo
>
>
>On May 18, 2005 at 13:34:09, Evgeny Shu wrote:
>
>>Hi ,
>>I would only like to pay your attention that the "new invented" technique is
>>well known.
>>I would also like to mention that acouple of years ago there was an article on
>>chessbase.com with explanation, games and diagrams!
>>The opening is exactly the same .. or it can go c4 e3 f4 and so on..
>>
>>So of course you are doing a good job implementing the well known technique :)
>>
>>Also many engines don't understand why sacrifice a knight on g5 square so you
>>can open h line for an attack - I suggest to try that one , more interesting to
>>play then Bd1-Be2-Bd1 ... (well maybe shredder - in some cases)
>>
>>Good luck :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.