Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Isn't this bad news for Lokasoft's Tiger and Gandalf bisnes?

Author: James T. Walker

Date: 04:24:43 05/19/05

Go up one level in this thread


On May 18, 2005 at 01:48:56, Dann Corbit wrote:

>On May 17, 2005 at 15:23:36, Graham Banks wrote:
>
>>On May 17, 2005 at 08:54:51, Jouni Uski wrote:
>>
>>>You get same performance now for free!!
>>>
>>>Jouni
>>
>>
>>I still contend that Chess Tiger 15 is stronger than Chess Tiger 2004
>
>Do you have any data to demonstrate that?
>
>I have heard several people say that, but I have never seen any statistical
>evidence.

I have "some" evidence that there is virtually no difference.  From my blitz
database of 31000 games.


1	Shredder 9		2522	627
2	Shredder 8C		2486	1014
3	Shredder 8		2483	1658
4	Shredder 7.04		2480	2111
5	Fritz 8			2473	4118
6	Fritz 7			2465	4278
7	Shredder 7		2460	1180
8	Junior 9		2451	1194
9	Chess Tiger 15		2450	2403
10	Hiarcs 9		2448	2483
11	CT2004			2448	1871
12	Chess Tiger 14.0	2447	2921
13	Shredder 7.04C		2445	874
14	Pro Deo 1.1		2444	345
15	Junior 8		2437	1921
16	Hiarcs 9(A/H)		2431	394



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.