Author: Drexel,Michael
Date: 15:18:48 05/19/05
Go up one level in this thread
On May 19, 2005 at 17:41:23, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >On May 19, 2005 at 17:38:00, Drexel,Michael wrote: > >>On May 19, 2005 at 15:56:01, Peter Skinner wrote: >> >>>On May 19, 2005 at 15:42:06, WAEL DEEB wrote: >>> >>>>Hi Peter, >>>>Yes,I may have overreacted when I sais "cheap play" or something like that :-) >>>>Overall,I agree with your comments too! >>>>It's just that finding a backdoor and using it over and over is not interesting! >>>>Cheers, >>>>Dr.Wael Deeb >>> >>>Finding the backdoor and exploiting it is human nature. Nothing more. >>> >>>The Kure and Neechi books are famous for "booking up" against opponents at major >>>tournaments. >>> >>>Grandmasters do the same. Probably more so. >>> >>>As I said before, I don't like Ed's "style" of play and to me is very boring. >> >>It >>>takes no imagination, no creativity. >>> >>>Maybe I am just stupid in preferring to attack strengths and not weaknesses of >>>my opponent to learn and challenge me more than an "easy win"... >> >>It`s not an easy win at all. >>It simply doesn´t work often and it doesn`t work at all if the Computer is >>prepared against it. > >If I play a human player, I play a human player, just one - NOT 25 operators and >above all it's fair. If I play a machine I must play against opening books >bigger than the many chess enzyclpedies. Why? You don´t have to play them with opening books. If you play a machine it isn't fair. >Therefore I dont understand the subject line. Playing the same opening line again and again against Computers until it finally works and then publish only the win isn`t "fair" either. Michael > > >> >>Michael >> >>> >>>Peter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.