Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: backsolving is the solution of chess(2)

Author: Terry McCracken

Date: 00:41:59 05/20/05

Go up one level in this thread


On May 20, 2005 at 03:37:46, jefkaan wrote:

>oops, small addition..:
>
>On May 20, 2005 at 03:31:01, jefkaan wrote:
>
>>with Moore's law, it might take only a few hundred
>>years to solve chess.
>
>of course i mean chess+,
>that is chess without the 50 move draw rule.
>with that rule chess probably is a draw.
>
>unequal bishops and so on spoil the game.
>
>but without the 50 move rule there might be a connection
>between 'best' opening lines and winning endgames
>
>not impossible; anyone who thinks differently
>may challenge my opinion without throwing insults,
>thx in advance
>jef


I already did, look above. IMO you have to disprove chess is a draw...too much
evidence to the contrary.



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.