Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Whom are you arguing with?

Author: chandler yergin

Date: 13:20:59 05/20/05

Go up one level in this thread


On May 20, 2005 at 16:08:38, Terry McCracken wrote:

>On May 20, 2005 at 12:21:28, chandler yergin wrote:
>
>>On May 20, 2005 at 03:41:59, Terry McCracken wrote:
>>
>>>On May 20, 2005 at 03:37:46, jefkaan wrote:
>>>
>>>>oops, small addition..:
>>>>
>>>>On May 20, 2005 at 03:31:01, jefkaan wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>with Moore's law, it might take only a few hundred
>>>>>years to solve chess.
>>>>
>>>>of course i mean chess+,
>>>>that is chess without the 50 move draw rule.
>>
>>Then it is not chess!
>>Nor is Baseball a sport without the "3 Strikes and you're Out" Rule.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>with that rule chess probably is a draw.
>>>>
>>>>unequal bishops and so on spoil the game.
>>>>
>>>>but without the 50 move rule there might be a connection
>>>>between 'best' opening lines and winning endgames
>>
>>
>>Why waste time on hypotheticals?
>>Play by the Rules & consider possibilites, only within those rules.
>>
>>
>>>>
>>>>not impossible; anyone who thinks differently
>>>>may challenge my opinion without throwing insults,
>>>>thx in advance
>>>>jef
>>>
>>>
>>>I already did, look above. IMO you have to disprove chess is a draw...too much
>>>evidence to the contrary.
>>
>>Draws among the Top Players have increased.
>>Tournament organizers are taking action now to preclude this.
>>
>>http://chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=2399
>>
>>Super GM Tournament
>>in Sofia
>>Six of the world's top players
>>clash in the M-Tel Masters
>>May 11 to 22, 2005
>>in the Grand Hotel Sofia, Bulgaria
>>
>>The Mtel Masters Super Tournament is under way. It is a category 20 event with
>>an Elo average of 2744. The time controls are classic (up to seven hours per
>>game) and the tournament is a double round robin (every player plays every other
>>player twice). There is a special rule in place at this Super Tournament: draw
>>offers are not allowed, i.e. draws by mutual agreement between the players are
>>forbidden, only technical draws may be given by the arbiter.
>>
>>          I think we will more of these types of Tournaments.
>>
>>
>> As far as using Computer Programs for GM's to use for home analysis,
>>they have their limitations too.
>>A player is faced with an average of only about 35 legal moves to consider with
>>each turn.
>>Each move and its response is called a ply. The fastest chess programs like
>>Fritz, & Shredder look ahead seven or eight plies into the game at 100Kn's per
>>second, with interesting variations being searched to perhaps depth of 40 - 50
>>Ply.
>>
>>The result is a densely proliferating tree of possibilities with the branches
>>and twigs representing all the different ways the game could unfold. Looking
>>ahead just seven plies (14 individual chess moves) requires examining 35 to the
>>14th power (more than a billion trillion) leaves representing all the various
>>outcomes.
>>
>>As the computer tries to look deeper, the number of possibilities explodes.
>>Programmers have learned clever ways to "prune" the trees, so that all but a
>>fraction of the paths can be discarded without plumbing them all the way to the
>>bottom. Even so, a chess-playing computer looking ahead seven plies might
>>consider as many as 50 or 60 billion scenarios  with each iteration.
>>
>>Now consider a previous Post by Bruce, which confirms the above.
>>
>>Posted by Bruce Moreland (Profile) on April 11, 2005 at 20:12:00:
>>In Reply to: Re: Chess It is already "solved" posted by chandler yergin on April
>>10, 2005 at 21:33:19:
>>
>>To min-max chess using alpha-beta would require a horrific tree search.
>>
>>Assuming the branching factor would be about six, and stipulating that the game
>>can be solved in 40 moves (80 plies), which is clearly a horrific
>>under-estimate, the game tree size is on the order of 10^62.
>>
>>Even at a billion billion nodes per second, you could search for a billion
>>billion seconds, and you'd only be a billion billionth of the way to being a
>>billionth of the way done.
>>
>>bruce
>
>jfk or me or both?
>
>I stand by my point. Prove chess isn't a draw.

It can't be done! I agree with you!



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.