Author: chandler yergin
Date: 16:46:19 05/20/05
Go up one level in this thread
On May 20, 2005 at 03:41:59, Terry McCracken wrote: >On May 20, 2005 at 03:37:46, jefkaan wrote: > >>oops, small addition..: >> >>On May 20, 2005 at 03:31:01, jefkaan wrote: >> >>>with Moore's law, it might take only a few hundred >>>years to solve chess. >> >>of course i mean chess+, >>that is chess without the 50 move draw rule. >>with that rule chess probably is a draw. >> >>unequal bishops and so on spoil the game. >> >>but without the 50 move rule there might be a connection >>between 'best' opening lines and winning endgames >> >>not impossible; anyone who thinks differently >>may challenge my opinion without throwing insults, >>thx in advance >>jef > > >I already did, look above. IMO you have to disprove chess is a draw...too much >evidence to the contrary. Proving once again.. you don't know! The 'evidence' is against your position! The facts are against your position! Based on 1,114,334 Games 1-0 413,652 games = 34% 1/2 1/2 381,463 games or 35% 0-1 318,393 Games or 28% You have NO argument or point!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.