Author: Michael Yee
Date: 17:15:58 05/20/05
Go up one level in this thread
On May 20, 2005 at 19:57:02, chandler yergin wrote: >On May 20, 2005 at 19:46:45, Michael Yee wrote: > >>On May 20, 2005 at 19:32:46, chandler yergin wrote: >> >>>What don't you understand about this? >>>"For Analysis" Purposes; Chessbase considers one move and it's response >>>to be ONE PLY! >> >>I produced several examples supporting my take on it that you've chosen not to >>respond to. I can only assume that you disagree with them, too, or don't >>understand them. > >I have responded to them. >I told you what the definition of Ply is by Chessbase for analysis purposes! >They know! >You are the one that fails to grasp the obvious here! >Don't confuse apples & oranges.. > >If we are not talking 'analysis' I agree there are 2 Ply for each move. Okay, I didn't realize you were referring *only* to chessbase analysis (and not to chess in general). Sorry to drag it out. >> >>But like I said, it's not a big deal. Although it does help with discussions to >>have common terminology. >> >>Michael
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.