Author: Komputer Korner
Date: 18:18:18 05/20/05
True to their word on their Chessbase site, Shredder 9 's exciting new feature of not discarding it's analysis when the user manually steps back in the move path and then goes back to the latest position actually works well. How does this not weaken Shredder slightly when analyzing in infinite mode? I am wondering whether this feature (which seems to be a nice one because you don't have to wait for the latest analysis the 2nd time you view a position.)actually costs you more in the end because of hash table limits that may get reached. Does any other program do this? On a 2.8GHz computer with a 285 MB hash table, when does it get filled up with an average engine now and would this feature make much of a difference? Please, only chess computer programmers responses on this one.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.