Author: chandler yergin
Date: 23:56:15 05/20/05
Go up one level in this thread
On May 20, 2005 at 20:29:38, Terry McCracken wrote: >On May 20, 2005 at 19:46:19, chandler yergin wrote: > >>On May 20, 2005 at 03:41:59, Terry McCracken wrote: >> >>>On May 20, 2005 at 03:37:46, jefkaan wrote: >>> >>>>oops, small addition..: >>>> >>>>On May 20, 2005 at 03:31:01, jefkaan wrote: >>>> >>>>>with Moore's law, it might take only a few hundred >>>>>years to solve chess. >>>> >>>>of course i mean chess+, >>>>that is chess without the 50 move draw rule. >>>>with that rule chess probably is a draw. >>>> >>>>unequal bishops and so on spoil the game. >>>> >>>>but without the 50 move rule there might be a connection >>>>between 'best' opening lines and winning endgames >>>> >>>>not impossible; anyone who thinks differently >>>>may challenge my opinion without throwing insults, >>>>thx in advance >>>>jef >>> >>> >>>I already did, look above. IMO you have to disprove chess is a draw...too much >>>evidence to the contrary. >> >>Proving once again.. you don't know! >>The 'evidence' is against your position! >>The facts are against your position! >> >>Based on 1,114,334 Games >>1-0 413,652 games = 34% >> >>1/2 1/2 381,463 games or 35% >> >>0-1 318,393 Games or 28% >> >>You have NO argument or point! > >Would you quit arguing with me when I already asserted chess is a draw!! You can't prove it, Computers can't prove it, and the evidence of millions of games does not confirm it. So you can yell, whine, pout, & assert all you want.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.