Author: Terry McCracken
Date: 00:45:24 05/21/05
Go up one level in this thread
On May 21, 2005 at 02:56:15, chandler yergin wrote: >On May 20, 2005 at 20:29:38, Terry McCracken wrote: > >>On May 20, 2005 at 19:46:19, chandler yergin wrote: >> >>>On May 20, 2005 at 03:41:59, Terry McCracken wrote: >>> >>>>On May 20, 2005 at 03:37:46, jefkaan wrote: >>>> >>>>>oops, small addition..: >>>>> >>>>>On May 20, 2005 at 03:31:01, jefkaan wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>with Moore's law, it might take only a few hundred >>>>>>years to solve chess. >>>>> >>>>>of course i mean chess+, >>>>>that is chess without the 50 move draw rule. >>>>>with that rule chess probably is a draw. >>>>> >>>>>unequal bishops and so on spoil the game. >>>>> >>>>>but without the 50 move rule there might be a connection >>>>>between 'best' opening lines and winning endgames >>>>> >>>>>not impossible; anyone who thinks differently >>>>>may challenge my opinion without throwing insults, >>>>>thx in advance >>>>>jef >>>> >>>> >>>>I already did, look above. IMO you have to disprove chess is a draw...too much >>>>evidence to the contrary. >>> >>>Proving once again.. you don't know! >>>The 'evidence' is against your position! >>>The facts are against your position! >>> >>>Based on 1,114,334 Games >>>1-0 413,652 games = 34% >>> >>>1/2 1/2 381,463 games or 35% >>> >>>0-1 318,393 Games or 28% >>> >>>You have NO argument or point! >> >>Would you quit arguing with me when I already asserted chess is a draw!! > >You can't prove it, Computers can't prove it, and the evidence of millions >of games does not confirm it. > So you can yell, whine, pout, & assert all you want. Oh get off it Chan...if God played God it would be a draw. You'll have hard proof someday, but you'll likely be dead! But there is enough data to acertain chess is almost certainly a draw. So please don't be such a mule.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.