Author: Terry McCracken
Date: 01:05:17 05/21/05
Go up one level in this thread
On May 20, 2005 at 19:46:19, chandler yergin wrote: >On May 20, 2005 at 03:41:59, Terry McCracken wrote: > >>On May 20, 2005 at 03:37:46, jefkaan wrote: >> >>>oops, small addition..: >>> >>>On May 20, 2005 at 03:31:01, jefkaan wrote: >>> >>>>with Moore's law, it might take only a few hundred >>>>years to solve chess. >>> >>>of course i mean chess+, >>>that is chess without the 50 move draw rule. >>>with that rule chess probably is a draw. >>> >>>unequal bishops and so on spoil the game. >>> >>>but without the 50 move rule there might be a connection >>>between 'best' opening lines and winning endgames >>> >>>not impossible; anyone who thinks differently >>>may challenge my opinion without throwing insults, >>>thx in advance >>>jef >> >> >>I already did, look above. IMO you have to disprove chess is a draw...too much >>evidence to the contrary. > >Proving once again.. you don't know! >The 'evidence' is against your position! >The facts are against your position! > >Based on 1,114,334 Games >1-0 413,652 games = 34% > >1/2 1/2 381,463 games or 35% > >0-1 318,393 Games or 28% > >You have NO argument or point! Are you daft man? You just presented a sampling that actually favours my postion! You sir, are impossible.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.