Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Why not anti computer?

Author: Darrel Briley

Date: 10:08:53 05/21/05

Go up one level in this thread


On May 21, 2005 at 13:00:11, Uri Blass wrote:

>On May 21, 2005 at 12:43:33, Darrel Briley wrote:
>
>>On May 21, 2005 at 12:27:38, Evgeny Shu wrote:
>>
>>>anti chess is like the opposite of chess,
>>>but you actually ttry to win , so I would call it anti computer style :)
>>>That's how the technique called I believe
>>
>>No, from looking at the games, I don't think he tries to win
>
>No
>He certainly tries to win.
>
>He tries to win on time and time is part of the game.
>
>
>Uri

We could engage in a battle of semantics over this...(I.E. If I do nothing, then
my opponent will be unable to win, and will lose on time).  If this is a winning
attempt, then ok, he tries to win.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.