Author: Pablo Ignacio Restrepo
Date: 12:08:22 05/21/05
Go up one level in this thread
David. Agreed with you. It is the moment that a Top Human being Chess player to jump over the orthodox chess concepts. They ( On May 21, 2005 at 14:55:42, David H. McClain wrote: >Gentlemen, > >Now that the introductions are over regarding anti-chess strategies, opinions >and personalities, perhaps a "what if" hypothesis should be thrown out to talk >about. > >Since Michael Adams is a Super GM chess professional, he makes his living at >playing chess. With that stated, why wouldn't (couldn't) he use the well known >stategies of anti-chess and win a quick $60,000 by drawing all the games (@ >$10,000 per draw) with Hydra in next month's tournament 6 game tournament? > >It would seem simple enough to me for Adams to have the capacity to do this >using anti-chess methods. Why should he play into the strength of Hydra and >stand a very good chance of becoming a loser in each? > >It's obvious Hydra has significant weaknesses with anti-chess tactics. Would it >be considered unethical for Adams to do this? Afterall, the Hydra team states >over and over again that they are "the strongest chess entity in the world" and >as far as I can see, by using anti-chess tecniques by a truly Super GM, it could >be an easy $60,000 for Adams. > >Insults and criticisms are welcome. I have a thick skin! :) DHM
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.