Author: Komputer Korner
Date: 18:58:29 05/21/05
Go up one level in this thread
On May 21, 2005 at 20:09:18, chandler yergin wrote: >On May 21, 2005 at 17:44:05, Komputer Korner wrote: > >>Even though I like the ChessBase tree immensely and it was from my idea that >>convinced Matthius Wullenweber to implement the concept in the Chessbase >>interface and database, from the first day it came out, there were problems. As >>it stands now you can add a move to tree and sometimes it will then give you >>move statistics as if there was already a game with that move even though if >>you go back one ply, there is no unplayed transposition shown. I have the option >>checked to show unplayed transpositions. I have also noticed bogus statistics >>against certain nodes. > >If you add a move or a variation, you have changed the Tree. >It does affect the statistics. >This is not a Bug! The Program is doing what it's supposed to. I have put up with your accusations and ignorance long enough. This last post completely demonstrates your novice knowledge about computer chess and the Chessbase opening tree in specific terms. The statistics are based on results. Simple enough. Adding a move is not adding a result. Your response is laughable. I would base your age at around 16 based on many of your posts. Before you make a fool of yourself any farther, I would suggest you read a lot more on computer chess.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.