Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 19:45:58 05/21/05
Go up one level in this thread
On May 21, 2005 at 17:33:22, Dieter Buerssner wrote: >On May 21, 2005 at 17:04:07, Rolf Tueschen wrote: > >>Short summary in English: I told Eduard what I had in mind when I wrote my >>message. That he cant expect of making friends with programmers whose machine he >>would beat. > >As an engine programmer, I don't agree. Nice to hear that from you. Good for Eduard. > >> Because they doubt that Eduard could beat it in a public match with >>a tuned program against Eduard. > >It is not that interesting, whether Eduard is playing the games in public or >not. He is obviously pinpointing some serious weaknesses in chess engines. What >more could any engine programmer expect? The question is if it is neccessary and if it is possible to solve this actually. If it's a weakness which is only found after endless analyses, it's a question of the actually possible ressources. In a normal match in public Eduard couldn't find these holes. Dieter, this is how I've understood that topic. And that would also explain that programmers dare to meet GM although they haven't solved Eduard's points. IF these holes were really decisive then I wouldn't understand why Eduard isn't offered a contract? He surely would find further holes in the programs. > >Regards, >Dieter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.