Author: Pablo Ignacio Restrepo
Date: 21:44:07 05/21/05
Go up one level in this thread
Hello The games against Hydra was 60+15 last year. In 2005 I have played basically 10+10 Best Regards, Pablo Note. Hydra will be wining the challenger On May 21, 2005 at 16:44:31, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >On May 21, 2005 at 16:13:39, David H. McClain wrote: > >>On May 21, 2005 at 15:13:25, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >> >>>quote: "It's obvious Hydra has significant weaknesses with anti-chess tactics." >>> >>>What do you base that assumption on? >> >>Jonas, >> >>There have been enough games played against the Hydra team by Pablo and >>occasionally a few others that were draws with an occasional win using the >>anti-chess strategy. Pablo is an amatuer, not a professional, and he does it >>often enough to create doubt. Wouldn't you consider this a serious weakness >>from "The strongest chess entity in the world?" It would seem to me if a mere >>mortal amatuer can do this, the basis for a serious weakness is established. I >>am asking you, not telling you. >> >>Pablo doesn't even have a FIDE rating. I don't know if Edward Nemeth has any >>results against the Hydra team on Playchess. DHM > >Have he ever beat Hydra in a straight game, meaning not on time? > >Have you seen all his losses in the process? > >How many drawn and won games are we talking about (against Hydra)? and have you >seen them? > >Do you consider a win on time at 3 0 a success? > >Do you think he could beat Hydra in a similar match that Adams is up for under >the same conditions, using his "antichess" strategy? > >Do you think he could even draw Hydra under the above mentioned conditions? > >These are just a few questions that i think is important to ask in order to find >the answer to this "antichess" hype.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.