Author: Bruce Moreland
Date: 09:22:10 02/09/99
Go up one level in this thread
On February 09, 1999 at 08:48:04, Dann Corbit wrote: >What do you call a move so spectacular that it totally refutes a GM's !! move? >A triple whammy (!!!)! >R7/8/8/8/5k2/5pp1/8/6K1 w - -; id "Bruce Moreland Triple Whammy 1"; c0 formerly >i.d. ECE3.0084 with black to move, after bm Kf4; >5R2/8/7k/5p2/5Kp1/7p/8/8 w - -; id "Bruce Moreland Triple Whammy 2"; c0 i.d. >ECE3.0242 with black to move, after bm Kh6; >8/8/6p1/6p1/8/5K2/3R4/6kn w - -; id "Bruce Moreland Triple Whammy 3"; c0 >formerly id ECE3.0507 with black to move, after bm g6; Eef. First, I think it's important that someone else run these and find that black was busted in the original position. I've had bugs in my endgame tables before. One of the positions is in KPP vs KR at the root, and the other two go into tables quickly. These are not hard, assuming I don't have bugs. My line in ECE3.0242 is: 1. ... Kh6 2. Rf6+ Kg7 3. Rxf5. bruce bruce
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.