Author: Chris Taylor
Date: 01:01:59 05/22/05
Go up one level in this thread
On May 22, 2005 at 02:54:09, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On May 21, 2005 at 17:59:18, Chris Taylor wrote: > >>On May 21, 2005 at 17:41:56, Ernest Bonnem wrote: >> >>>What was the time control ? >>> >>>I recently also played Shredder9uci against Toga, using Nunn 1, no opening book >>>(since opening book can go further than Nunn), no learning (but on a single >>>computer). What surprised me was that when I repeated the match, a few days >>>later, the result was quite a bit different. >>>It would be interesting to find out, by repeating for instance Shredder9-Toga, >>>if you obtain practically the same result (+ 10,= 4,- 6). >>> >>> >> >>I have noted the same in the time I have been doing the auto232. Guess it just >>shows that loads of games are needed to even out the swings and roundabouts. >> >>If I repeated the same games, I may find a different result, when the dust >>settled once more. That is the fun of computer chess. >> >>Chris > > > Hi Chris > But you don't take this as an example that this behaviour > could be due to the use of auto232? > Kurt I thought about having all the machines on Eng-Eng, but chickened out? Guess I have been doing this too long to change! The only thing in its favour is the ponder aspect. Anyway there are loads of good eng-eng matches being played, all new pieces for the jigsaw that is the bigger picture! Chris...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.