Author: chandler yergin
Date: 01:57:37 05/22/05
Go up one level in this thread
On May 21, 2005 at 21:58:29, Komputer Korner wrote: >On May 21, 2005 at 20:09:18, chandler yergin wrote: > >>On May 21, 2005 at 17:44:05, Komputer Korner wrote: >> >>>Even though I like the ChessBase tree immensely and it was from my idea that >>>convinced Matthius Wullenweber to implement the concept in the Chessbase >>>interface and database, from the first day it came out, there were problems. As >>>it stands now you can add a move to tree and sometimes it will then give you >>>move statistics as if there was already a game with that move even though if >>>you go back one ply, there is no unplayed transposition shown. I have the option >>>checked to show unplayed transpositions. I have also noticed bogus statistics >>>against certain nodes. >> >>If you add a move or a variation, you have changed the Tree. >>It does affect the statistics. >>This is not a Bug! The Program is doing what it's supposed to. > >I have put up with your accusations and ignorance long enough. This last post >completely demonstrates your novice knowledge about computer chess and the >Chessbase opening tree in specific terms. The statistics are based on results. >Simple enough. Adding a move is not adding a result. You can add a move on the board. Before you can add it to the Tree, you must remove the 'write protection'. By Default, a Tree is write protected. Didn't know that did you? As I said before.. "Operator Error!" The Program works just fine. Oh, BTW since you are so rude, I'll let you figure out how to remove the write protection. ;) The readers can decide who is laughable here. Your response is laughable. > I would base your age at around 16 based on many of your posts. Before you make > a fool of yourself any farther, I would suggest you read a lot more on computer >chess.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.