Author: F. Huber
Date: 04:53:16 05/22/05
Go up one level in this thread
On May 22, 2005 at 07:49:07, Uri Blass wrote: >On May 22, 2005 at 07:15:53, F. Huber wrote: > >>On May 22, 2005 at 04:07:04, F. Huber wrote: >> >>>On May 21, 2005 at 19:10:05, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>> >>>>On May 21, 2005 at 19:07:03, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>>> >>>>>On May 21, 2005 at 08:55:25, F. Huber wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On May 21, 2005 at 07:57:38, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>[D]k1b5/Pp1p4/1P1Pp3/4Pp2/5Pp1/6P1/P6P/6K1 w - - 0 1 >>>>>> >>>>>>According to ChestUCI and its database it´s a #27: >>>>>> >>>>>>k1b5/Pp1p4/1P1Pp3/4Pp2/5Pp1/6P1/P6P/6K1 w - - bm #27; Duals(2); 05:06+ @ >>>>>>C0/R0/K2/P2/X12; (P4/2.66); >>>>>> >>>>>>Regards, >>>>>>Franz. >>>>> >>>>>I just tried ChestUCI but it actually solved it in 26, instead of 27. >>> >>>Thanks Jorge, >>> >>>maybe I´ve mistyped when writing this problem into my database - >>>I´ll try it again on my faster computer ... >> >>I´ve now tried it quite a long time to find a #26 - no success yet! :-( >> >>Could you please post the complete analysis output of ChestUCI for your >>solution in 26 moves (incl. the PV)? >> >>Franz. > >I can add that I also did not find mate in 26 in analysis but only mate in 27 >I believe that it is mate in 27. > >Uri Well, I also did (and still do) believe it´s only a #27! But I was wondering about Jorge´s statement: "I just tried ChestUCI but it actually solved it in 26, instead of 27." Franz.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.