Author: Pablo Ignacio Restrepo
Date: 06:47:25 05/22/05
Go up one level in this thread
On May 22, 2005 at 02:47:03, Steve Glanzfeld wrote: >On May 21, 2005 at 11:50:32, Pablo Ignacio Restrepo wrote: > >> >>On May 21, 2005 at 10:57:48, Thorsten Czub wrote: >> >>>the terminology goes back to the 80ties. >> >> >>Hello Thorsten, >> >>Thanks for the post. >> >> I have not been talking about "antichess" like suicide chess. > >Nobody said you did. You reply with that remark to people who didn't talk about >suicide chess either. We understand perfectly what you mean, but you just aren't >the inventor. The pawn chain idea as an anticomputer approach is old. Maybe it's >new for you, but it is definetely not new for computerchess world. Ask any >expert you like and he will acknowledge this. > >There is only a thin line between > >(a) entertaining people with remarkable anticomputer examples, or > >(b) starting to annoy people with claims like beeing the greatest anticomputer >inventor of all times and things like that. Please forget the New York Times. I >would be sorry to see you spoiling the sympathy and reputation you have earned, >so far. > >Steve Hello Steve The wall of course was an old idea. The bird and Holand defense are an example. But the idea to play in first 3 lines or rows all the time broking the algorithm as a sistematic method was born where and when I said. And the ANTI-CHESS new word meaning exacly in these moment and place. All the time you anyone tell "ANTI-CHESS" or "ANTIAJEDREZ" in the new direction are taking about me. Sorry.... Now many people know that perfectly. For me this have not been a problem, becouse the history have been wrote yet. Regard, Pablo
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.