Author: Steve B
Date: 07:22:00 05/22/05
Go up one level in this thread
>I played 4 games R30 vs RR myself using that time control. The Tasc leads in >this minimatch 3-1, however this obviously means nothing. > hmmm even more evidence the Tasc is still stronger >One of course could give the R30 10 sec more per move to see if the difference >is that ´significant´ ;) (I know, there is also more RAM in the R40 but with >shorter time controls this gives probably almost no advantage at all). I >remember Ruud saying that he once tuned one of his R30 to the R40 level but >didn't see much difference at all. *shrug* To avoid misunderstanding: I of >course don't want to derogate your R40 at all... :D aah home made tuning is perhaps not the same :)) in either event if the Res cannot even defeat the slower and less rammed R30 there will be no need for the current title holder to leave his throne and even get out of bed to face the new challenger he can remain in his thorne confident in knowing that even after 10 years of progress with processors and computers he is still the worlds strongest Heels Dug In Regards Steve > >> >>of course in longer games the difference will be less >> >>i am intending a match of 5 games at 30min/game >> >>but i wait for more results >> >>R40 Regards >>Steve > >Needling Regards, ;) >Martin
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.