Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Human vs. human "anti-chess" ?

Author: Fernando Villegas

Date: 15:36:25 05/22/05

Go up one level in this thread


More or less it is because of this: I do not play tennis, I have not ever in my
life take a racket, but if I do not show myself in a lawn against Federer, I
will avoid a lose no matter what.
Anti-computer is in a way not to play chess. Not playing chess at all, you
cannot lose a game of chess.
The GM try to play chess and so he puts himself in a position with a risk  to
lose. So he can be beaten.
Anti-computer chess is nonsense. Better way not to lose to a computer is not to
play a computer at all and besides you save time.
I purchase or get programs or dedicated units to play and get fun, no matter if
I never win a game. The core of the issue is the fun. Don't you agree?
Do not worry anymore about anticomputer hoopla and just play and enjoy.
Fernando



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.