Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: One more try! Shredder 9 plus 7.04 would reign supreme for years!!!!!!!!

Author: stuart taylor

Date: 18:06:52 05/22/05

Go up one level in this thread


On May 22, 2005 at 20:49:26, chandler yergin wrote:

>On May 22, 2005 at 20:39:32, stuart taylor wrote:
>
>> If the qualities of Shredder 7.04 can be added to the qualities of Shredder 9,
>>without taking down from either, then that program would be so far above, that
>>I'd expect it would be a lasting legend.
>
>
>A Computer is dumb!
>
>Main Entry: [1]dumb
>Pronunciation: 'd&m
>Function: adjective
>Etymology: Middle English, from Old English; akin to Old High German tumb mute
>Date: before 12th century
>1 : lacking the power of speech <deaf and dumb from birth> <dumb animals>
>2 : temporarily unable to speak (as from shock or astonishment) <struck dumb
>with fear>
>3 : not expressed in uttered words <dumb grief>
>4 : SILENT; also : TACITURN
>5 : lacking some usual attribute or accompaniment; especially : having no means
>of self-propulsion <dumb barge>
>6 a : markedly lacking in intelligence : STUPID b : showing a lack of
>intelligence c : having little or no meaning — sometimes used in the phrase dumb
>luck
>7 : not having the capability to process data <a dumb terminal>; compare
>INTELLIGENT 3a
>synonym see STUPID
>- dumb·ly /'d&m-lE/ adverb
>- dumb·ness noun
>usage There is evidence that, when applied to persons who cannot speak, dumb has
>come to be considered offensive.
>
>Pronunciation Key
>
>© 2001 by Merriam-Webster, Incorporated
>Merriam-Webster Privacy Policy
>
>That is what the IBM Scientits said about Deep Blue!
>Dumber than the stupidest Human!
>
>  No other program would ever be able to
>>defeat it in a crushing way...ever! (with equal hardware and timings).
>>
>>Do Shredder realize this?
>
>A Program doesn't realize "anything"!
>

I mean, it's programmer(s).
Is that all you were trying to say?

The fact that a program is dumb, is what makes it the most interesting thing, to
see it looking like a human, appreciated by those who understand the language of
chess.
S.Taylor
>
>>
>>If so, perhaps they managed to do this with the latest 64-bit upgrade?
>>
>>Then, it would be worth getting a 64-bit computer in honour of it. But that
>>shouldn't mean that it should not be re-done even again, back to 32-bit, as an
>>upgrade patch (perhaps something like 9.04).
>>
>>S.Taylor



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.