Author: Komputer Korner
Date: 19:38:25 05/22/05
Go up one level in this thread
On May 22, 2005 at 17:47:35, Henrik Dinesen wrote: >On May 22, 2005 at 13:47:15, Komputer Korner wrote: > >>On May 22, 2005 at 12:08:32, chandler yergin wrote: >> >>> >>>What you are describing if I understand, is what you consider to be long >>>disc accessing time when first starting up. >>>Chessbase 9 is a much more sophisticated Program than Chessbase 7. >>>Shredder 9 is a much more sophisticated Program than Fritz 5.32 >>> >>>It takes them a lot longer to fully Load! >>>Especially if you have writtten the Player Encyclopedia and EGTB's to your >>>Hard drive. >>>This is not a Unique Problem! >>> It is not a problem. >>>It's the normal time it takes to load all the information. >>>Go grab a beer and wait it out. >> >>I am not describing a startup situation with Shredder9. It is a situation caused >>by other programs. Sometimes depending on what other programs you run at the >>same time, unless you shut down Shredder9 and restart it will crawl because of >>hard disk access for the hash table. There is one other choice. Resize the hash >>table but this takes almost as long as shutting down and restarting and is a >>ridiculous choice because you are then left with a lower hash size. My technique >>of shutting down and restarting solves the problem and has the advantage of >>maintaining the large hash table without hard disk access. > >Out of curriocity: Why do you need that HT-size? > >The only situation I can imagine, would be when running 'infinite' for some >reason, like someone apparantly does for corr-games. > >Regards, >Henrik I use infinite analysis for analyzing positions. The larger hash table size the better. You can never have enough hash table if the engine is calculating for long periods of time.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.